Palmer’s
- 991 N. Peachtree Parkway, Peachtree City, GA 30269
- (770) 629-5280
- October 12, 2026
RESEARCH-BASED REVIEW, NOT A FIRST-HAND VISIT. Everything below comes from the public sources listed at the end, accessed on 2026-10-11. No one from this site has eaten here for this review. Food-quality scores rely on public signals and are provisional.
| Overall | 6.3 / 10 (★★★ (3.0/5), “Fair / unproven”) |
| Confidence | Medium. Regulator record, Restaurantji and the official site; no Tripadvisor or OpenTable. |
| Category | Restaurants › Mexican / Seafood |
| Last verified | 2026-10-11 |
Score change (2026-10-11): new review → 6.3. Why: first scored review of this business (no previous score).
Mexican grill and seafood with online ordering [3]. The /menu page returned 404 on 2026-10-11.
Restaurantji 4.4/175 (82% 5★, 9% 1★) [2]; the summary praises burrito bowls, queso and the remodel [2].
Georgia DPH food-service inspections, last 24 months (official portal ga.healthinspections.us, facility “Los Mariachis III LLC DBA Fuego Y Mar”, permit FSP-056-001289 [1]). Georgia grades: A = 90–100, B = 80–89, C = 70–79, U = 69 or below (unsatisfactory).
| Date | Inspection type | Score | Grade | Violations | Repeat | Priority items (9-point / 4-point) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-04 | Routine | 84 | B | 9 | 3 | food-contact surfaces: cleaned & sanitized; proper date marking and disposition (repeat); proper date marking and disposition |
| 2026-07-14 | Followup | 71 | C | 13 | 3 | proper eating, tasting, drinking, or tobacco use (repeat); toxic substances properly identified, stored, used |
| 2026-06-30 | Followup | 61 | U | 13 | 10 | management knowledge, responsibilities, reporting (repeat); proper eating, tasting, drinking, or tobacco use (repeat); response procedures for vomiting & diarrheal events (repeat); food stored covered (repeat); proper cold holding temperatures (repeat) |
| 2026-06-23 | Routine | 60 | U | 22 | 0 | management knowledge, responsibilities, reporting; proper eating, tasting, drinking, or tobacco use; adequate handwashing facilities supplied & accessible; response procedures for vomiting & diarrheal events; food separated and protected |
| 2025-09-25 | Initial | 80 | B | 8 | 0 | food stored covered; proper cold holding temperatures; proper hot holding temperatures |
| 2025-06-23 | Issued Provisional Permit | 81 | B | 7 | 0 | food stored covered; proper date marking and disposition; toxic substances properly identified, stored, used |
Health & safety rubric score: 3/10. Rule used for every restaurant: base on the latest routine score (95+ → 9, 90–94 → 8, 85–89 → 7, 80–84 → 6, 70–79 → 5, under 70 → 3); −1 for another C-range result or −2 for another unsatisfactory result in the window; +1 if a follow-up after a sub-90 routine scored 95+; −1 if the latest routine has 2+ repeat violations. Provisional-permit (pre-opening) inspections are listed but not scored. Applied here: latest routine 84/100 (B) on 2026-09-04; an unsatisfactory (<70) inspection in the last 24 months (−2); 3 repeat violations on the latest routine (−1).
Not verified (menu page 404).
| Platform | Rating | Reviews | Newest | Notes | Data source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restaurantji | 4.4 | 175 | 2025-12-15 | distribution 5★..1★ 82/1/5/3/9%; Food 4.5, Service 4.5; price $$. Page summary is machine-generated (labeled, not scored). | direct read |
| Tripadvisor | — | — | — | no listing found | search |
| OpenTable | — | — | — | no OpenTable profile found in the PTC OpenTable search | direct read (search page) |
| Yelp | — | — | — | blocked by a bot check; not bypassed and not counted | blocked |
Blocked or unavailable: Yelp (bot check), Restaurant Guru (served a “verify you are human” page after three fetches; we stopped and used only the three pages read before that), and official sites behind Cloudflare. We did not get around any bot check. Ratings marked “Google-derived” come from Exa Places or Restaurant Guru pages that republish Google Maps data; they were read directly but are third-party copies.
The rubric weights below make up 90% of the score; recent customer experience (keyword analysis) is the other 10%. Overall is capped at 9.0. Unknown criteria score 5. See /how-we-score/. | Criterion | Weight | Score | Evidence | |—|—|—|—| | Food quality (provisional) | 30% | 7 | 4.4/175, food sub-score 4.5 [2] | | Service | 20% | 7 | Service sub-score 4.5 [2] | | Value & price transparency | 15% | 5 | No prices verified | | Reputation consistency | 15% | 7 | One platform with volume | | Health & safety (GA DPH) | 10% | 3 | Rule-based from the DPH history below; latest routine 84/100 (B) on 2026-09-04 | | Atmosphere, access & convenience | 10% | 7 | Long published hours; online ordering [3] | | Recent customer experience (keyword analysis, last 24 months) | 10% | 6.1 | n=3; 6 positive vs 0 negative theme mentions | | Overall | | 6.3 | 0.9 × 6.30 (weighted average of the rubric rows) + 0.1 × 6.1 = 6.280 → 6.3 |
Reviews are good, but two failed inspections in a row in mid-2026 are a serious caveat. The Sept 2026 score of 84 shows improvement; watch the next routine inspection.
Research-based, not a first-hand visit. Data labeled “unconfirmed” (search snippets, machine summaries) is shown for context only and never moves a score.
Disclosure: no compensation, free meals, discounts, or affiliate relationship. Nothing here was published or sent to the business. Found an error? See /corrections. How we score: /how-we-score/.
There are no reviews yet.